Conflicting Perspectives: Ted Hughes’ Anthology of Birthday Letters Essay

CONFLICTING PERSPECTIVESConflicting perspectives hoist due to infixed human experiences, impressioning in selection perceptions of situations, events and personalities. In Ted Hughes anthology of Birthday Letters, song is utilised as an emotional medium to extend the transient nature of perspectives by reflecting on his libertine relationship with Sylvia Plath concurrently chin wag MM1 ? Are you sure you motivation to opine perspectives ar ephemeral?You do know that means temporary, orshortlived right? bring out how composers can manipulate the preconceived ideas of responders to protect public identity. Ted Hughes utilises the poetic form and his reflection on his turbulent relationship with Sylvia Plath as a means to express the X nature of strange perspectives, ultimately disclosure how composers can manipulate the preconceived ideas of responders to protect their public identity. (Hughes poem Full BrightFulbright Scholars discusses how memories be subjective, and ma y budge with time, whilst Red is positioned to irresolution the conflict regarding Plaths personality.) Alternatively, both Sidney Lumets 12 Angry Men and Sarah Curchwells es severalize Secret and Lies explore how perspectives are coloured by footnote MM2 Or perhaps honorable telltale(a) the role of personal agenda in manipulating public perception stimulation MM3 Too long, withal wordy, too many ideas in the one sentence. Also, poetry is the textual form, not the medium they refer to in the rubric if youre referring to medium in another sense of the word, find another way to express it chit-chat MM4 Er, I wouldnt really introduce these in the introduction preferably leave until the beinterpretation and personal inclinees. These varying perspectives are necessary for audiences to better discern the truth from through an dread of why opposed perspectives encounter.The interplay between memory and hindsight rarely tessellate with the truth, as memories are inherently a quiline on subjective human experience. This subjectivity is seen through the sense of uncertainty which permeates Full BrightFulbright Scholars, with the rhetorical question in where was it, in the strand? and repetition of the speculative look in maybe and or revealing the inner conflict between real events and memory. The older nostalgic Hughes evidences an irony in that he distinctly appears to remember the negative aspects of Plath at that time, with the layering effect and negative connotation in her exaggerated American smiling for the cameras, the judges, the strangers reinforcing her as superficialher superficiality/her public faade. Further, the allusion to an actress famed for her role as the femme fatale, her in Veronica Lake bang is an innuendo about her multiple masks disguising her true personality.This reveals the range of hindsight, as the additional communicateation of Plath delivers a better understanding of a past situation. Similarly, in The Shot, Hughes argues through an extended metaphor that the vague mist of her superficiality prevented him from sensing her true intent. The He utilises the pass off visual imagery of the gun is to suggest that the truth had always existed, and insofar Hughes commenting that the truth was always there, yet his emotions influenced his perceptions, as he metaphorically did not even know he had been hit. This These ideas reveals that memories areComment MM5 This is niceComment MM6 Avoid too much certainty clearly also you beneficial said sense of uncertainty, and yet he clearly remembersComment MM7 Need to explain Comment MM8 Hmm, perhaps, nevertheless probably not the most effective explanation of this allusion/technique. Veronica Lake was known for her role as the femme fatale a role where basically the woman seduces the man to his downfall. Yes, it kind of is an innuendo to the fact that she, too, has a personal agenda, exactly the point of that innuendo is to suggest that Plath is ultimat ely to blame, i.e. cast her in a negative light as opposed to himself, reversing preconceived ideasthat it was very his transformation as obviously the femme fatale is seen as being at fault for leading the male character to his downfall.Comment MM9 Information? The term seems too objective how can you be sure this is information and not a purposeful misportrayal? Also, would you regard hindsight as a value or a fallibility?The question here is the question of CP, its nature and how they arise value of hindsight is ultimately strange unless you can link it back to CP (when I said fallibility, fallibility in the sense that it distorts the true memory he did not, at the time, notice her exaggerated grin or her numerous flaws. Yet, in hindsight, he is. Is this really a value when we are looking in terms of the truth? (your topic sentence)subjectivethe subjectivity of nature, and that hindsight can be a more(prenominal) objective tool which can be make use ofd to reveal the tru th.Conflicting perspectives arise from the conflict of personal agenda, as composers attempt to manipulate responders attitudes. This is conveyed inHughes poem, Red, where Conflicting perspectives often occur when individuals contend with each other in order to persuade responders on their correct views, as occurs in Red.Hughes he personifies Plaths rage and passion through the extended metaphor of Red,, with the The alliterative tone in you revelled in red suggesting suggests that Plaths life was dominated by images of blood. This unwarranted imagery and recurring motif of the blood, as seen in the carpet of blood patterned with darkenings and congealments reveals Plaths victimisation of Hughes, through the waste imagery how Plath victimized Hughes. When considering this in contextComment MM14 I like the firstsentence, but Im not so sure about your explanation of the composers purpose. How does the fact that she saw poetry as a solace from life reflect a glowering personality?th rough the use of personal pronouns which accentuate the contrast between the extendedComment MM15 States? Stating is Ihave a script a direct command.perceptions of Plaths personality as conveyed through her poetry. states that responders seem to have a false perception of Plaths personalitythrough her poetry. This is similarlymetaphor of Your Paris and My Paris. Through this, Hughes suggests that responders sympathetic interpretations of Plaths Paris, as a misinterpretation of her true private life, are skewed. By extension responders interpretations of Plaths Paris are seen as incorrect, as it differs from her true private life. This reveals that composers can use emotiveComment MM16 Within? Do you mean the multiple unlike perspectives of Plaths character, or Plaths own conflicting natures? Comment MM17 You need to try and be more subtle, incorrect is far too confident/ cutting a termtechniques to mislead audiences. When Hughes informs responders that Plath has more than one s ide, he is forcing responders to ask themselves if they know the real Plath.Contrastingly, interpretations of texts are often found to be conflictingconflict due to responders presumptions regarding events. In the scholarly essay Secrets and Lies, Churchwell adopts a feminist viewpoint to critique Hughes perspective regarding Plaths suicide when she states I dont look at in this kind of determinism. I dont believe she was doomed to die. I dont believe that for one minute. The repetition of the I dontThrough the use of intense emotive language and hyperbole she presents her view that Hughes was a monster who forced his wife into a life of national drudgery, with the bestial imagery of monster further emphasising her distaste of Hughes. Thus, when Churchwell presents her feminist view that Plath became a martyr, she is dis nurseing with Hughes public opinion that her trajectory perfect, as in The shot. Thus, Churchwell utilises persuasive language and the essay structure as a seemi ngly intellectual and un diagonal form to enhance a tone of authority and position responders to agree with Churchwellher. This is a nicely written paragraph, but much too short. Further, quite a bit of it is apparently stating/discussing her view.To move with certainty into the B6 range, you need to actually analyse it in relation to the nature of conflicting perspectives what does whatever the composer say implicitly show? (Her manipulation, her personal agenda, her personal bias) you need to do more than state her view, and actually position yourself as an objective triad party, analysing her influences and so on. She is clearly strongly biased against Hughes, and you need to say this what you basically say is that she is disgusted with Hughes, yes, but this reveals her personal bias. She does not attempt to view both sides of the situation. In fact, did she even know either of them personally? (Uncertain) Either way, she is merely another biased and speculative third part y slenderly ironic.Similarly to Churchwell, Sidney Lumets 12 Angry Men discusses how stigmas and preconceived ideas can result in a misappropriation of the truth. juror 4s stigma is seen as he generalises and externalises his hate of the lowersocioeconomic class, stating that children of slum backgrounds are potential menaces with a close-up of his forceful exterior revealingComment MM19 You jump too fast into analysis, you need to ease the marker in. What is the text even about? (Explain in relation to CP)the strength of his belief. However, the deadpan silence which follows the shrill non-diegetic music of Juror 4s statement is the utility of the film medium to break the fourth wall and forces audiences to consider the error of this, as films allow audiences to understand both perspectives. Hughes similarly identifies his own bias with the juxtaposition of Plaths aestheticized city with the admission that my perspectives were hide ironically presentedComment MM20 This phrasing doesnt make sense.Comment MM21 How This is too vague and generalto inform audiences of Hughes truths despite utilising a medium where emotive language is paramount. Thus, when a low angle shot accompanies Juror 11s forceful tone when he uses juxtaposes both inclusive and exclusive language to say assert that were right and hes wrong, the audience understands that it is impossible for two parties with opposingComment MM24 Definitely too long a link should be effective, perhaps 2030words.These conflicting perspectives between Hughes and Churchwell arise as a result of the difference in representations and mediations which consistently interfere with the macrocosm of direct, private, inner access to reality in Hughes relationship to Plath, with Lumet further attributing this to personal biases and stigmas This representation of a subjective event toComment MM25 Okay but your essay should be on the general nature of conflicting perspectives, just like your belonging essay should be o n the general nature of belonging credence nurtures a sense of identity vs. H&C highlight different ideas of acceptance within their texts (some liaison textspecific)reveal a more serious issue regarding Plaths suicide and Juror 4s bias are the composersFormatted Font Boldinforming responders to critically evaluate all information, and attempt to identity andComment MM26 Wouldnt you say all of them have personal bias?disregard their own stigmas when considering potentially biased information.Formatted Font BoldComment MM27 What is the more serious issue? Should you really be almost suggesting that anything is more serious than suicide?Formatted Font BoldComment MM28 Conclusion is far too long and ineffective. Also, somewhat oddly unsophisticated at times. A load of odd grammatical errors. Yet the whole thing needs to be written again rather than rewriting what you have here.howyoushouldbewritingistoshowyouoneofmyownpreparedparagraphs Composers of a text present attitudes which are shaped by their underlying personal agendas. Ted Hughes Birthday Letters, as a collection of poems which contribution together his relationship with Sylvia Plath, works to challenge the medias vilification of him. In The Minotaur, Hughes portrays Plath as the aggressor in their relationship by casting himself into the role of the victim. This is conveyed through the deliberate use of familial connotations whilst he describes Plaths smashing of his mothers heirloom sideboard, to evoke the responders sympathy for his plight. The sense of loss, which is furthered in the metaphor mapped with the scars of my whole life, illustrates the significantly damaging impact Plath has made on his past. In the violent imagery and mythicalSuch manipulation of textual form conveys Hughes coloured perspective as he attempts to reverse previously biased attitudes towards Plath, highlighting the way in which personal agenda shapes a composers representation.